Ask Your Legal Question. Legal Experts Answer You ASAP.

(Not a Legal Question?)

I HAVE AN EX PARTE ORDER WHICH STATES, "IT IS ORDERED ...
Sent to Legal Experts May 18 07:15 AM

I HAVE AN EX PARTE ORDER WHICH STATES, "IT IS ORDERED THAT THE LICENSE TO CARRY A CONCEALED HANDGUN THAT WAS ISSUED TO RESPONDENT, BRIAN DRAKSLER, UNDER SECTION 411.177 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE IS SUSPENDED."

My guestion is, does this mean he indeed did have a concealed license?

Thanks,
Missy

 

Optional Information:
katy, Texas

Already Tried:
already have attorney, but he has been in trial

Customer (name blocked for privacy)
Status:  Closed   Value: $9
Answer
May 18 8:54 AM (1 hour and 38 minutes and 58 seconds later)
         
REPLIEDCheck Mark
It certainly suggests very strongly that a permit or license was previously issued by the State of Texas to Mr. Draksler. The order is NOT conclusive proof nor would it serve as a license, but it again in the strongest terms implies that Brian had that license before or present has the license but it is suspended

Attorneys are limited to offering specific legal advice in states where they are licensed. Online responses offered here are ADVISORY OPINIONS only and should NOT be considered specific legal advice! Consult a local attorney for specific advice.
Picture
LegalEagle, LLC -- Licensed Attorney -- 100% Positive Feedback on 1262 Legal Accepts
Actual online opinions from actual attorneys! Check out all of our positive feedback!
Reply
May 18 9:27 AM (32 minutes and 36 seconds later)
         
Reply to LegalEagle, LLC's Post: no, As I know you were trying to be helpful, however it does not give me a conclusive yes or no.

Thank you for your help.

Missy
Customer (name blocked for privacy)
Answer
May 18 9:56 AM (28 minutes and 53 seconds later)
         
ACCEPTEDCheck Mark
The problem with a conclusive yes or no is the fact that the order clearly indicates that the Court beleives that Mr. Draksler has a concealed weapon license and therefore suspended it, however, the only party that would truly know for sure would be the state licensing agency. It would be strange for a court to suspend a license or permit that doesn't exist in this manner. Such a suspension would be worded "suspend any existing licenses or the right to apply for such licenses." The Court's language again is strong confirmation that he held that license, but the Court wouldn't have jurisdiction to grant the license and therefore it would be impossible to ever conclude, beyond a shadow of a doubt from this order, that he did or did not have the license.

Attorneys are limited to offering specific legal advice in states where they are licensed. Online responses offered here are ADVISORY OPINIONS only and should NOT be considered specific legal advice! Consult a local attorney for specific advice.
Picture
LegalEagle, LLC -- Licensed Attorney -- 100% Positive Feedback on 1262 Legal Accepts
Actual online opinions from actual attorneys! Check out all of our positive feedback!
Think you can answer this question?
Login or Become an Expert

Related Answers

 

DISCLAIMER: You acknowledge that any information you may obtain from individuals you contact through use of the Just Answer service comes from those individuals, not from Just Answer!, and that Just Answer is not in any way responsible for any of the information these third parties may supply. The site and services are provided "as is" with no warranty and no representations are made regarding the qualification of an Expert. Responses and comments on Just Answer! are for general information and are not intended to substitute for informed professional advice (such as medical, legal, investment or accounting) and do not establish a professional-client relationship. Just Answer! is not intended or designed to address EMERGENCY QUESTIONS which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service.

Just Answer! > Legal