I went back...it's clear there's no distribution until dad's death. The reason I asked it again was that I didn't understand why you keep talking about dividing the corpus NOW. I'll answer the questions.
1. If there is no termination of the trust then any income distribution IF IT IS ALLOWED IN THE TRUST INSTRUMENT or invasion of corpus IF IT ALLOWED IN THE TRUST INSTRUMENT...would have to be proven as DAD's need ONLY not favorite's. If you distribute...and dissolve the trust..not only do you get "crumbs", but you have no control over who dad gives his disproportionate share to.
2. If you are going to settle, you should settle for no less than what you would be entitled to if dad had just died. THERE IS NO REASON TO COMPROMISE.
3. A mediator should be just that...impartial. If he/she is truly showing PARTIALITY..move in court to have him removed.
4. I don't know what Legal Eagle was thinking. The trust instrument controls here.
5. NO. The trust instrument controls. If mom wanted your respective financial situations to be considered, she could have created trust language to accommodate that.
6. This is not a question the of side with the most lawyers wins. It is a function of the side with the best legal position (I think yours is solid). Then you need a tough lawyer who knows how to strategize, look the other side in the eye and MAKE THEM BLINK FIRST (sorry man..I'm a NYC trial lawyer!!!!).
Rich Licata
Edited by Richard V. Licata on February 17 2007 at 6:12 PM
To request me for NEW QUESTIONS IN THE FUTURE, just begin with "THIS IS FOR RVLAW"
THIS IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP EXISTS. CONSULT A LAWYER IN YOUR STATE FOR LEGAL ADVICE