Ask Your Legal Question. Legal Experts Answer You ASAP.

(Not a Legal Question?)

When is it appropriate for the decendents drafting attorney

Sent to Legal Experts October 24 2007 at 5:24 PM
   

When the drafting will/trust attorney of decendent, submittal to probate, becomes the attorney for the corporate personal representative, or administrator of trust, whose best interest is he representing?

 

Optional Information:
noth palm beach , Florida

Already Tried:
hired an attorney who has not answered this question to date./

Customer (name blocked for privacy)
Answer
October 24 2007 at 5:29 PM (4 minutes and 56 seconds later)
         
ACCEPTEDCheck Mark

Hi,

There is no conflict of interest at all. The attorney's interests are identical in both situations. When he drafted the instrument for the testator/now deceased, he was presumably acting in his best interests. The testator appointed the corporate executor who is now the representative of the decedent charged with the task of carrying out the deceased's wishes. The attorney, now representing that new client, is charged with seeing to it that those wishes are properly carried out....the same issues as to which the testator consulted him when the will was drawn in the first instance.

Rich Licata




IF YOU ARE SATISFIED WITH THE ANSWER, PRESS THE GREEN ACCEPT BUTTON.. Start future questions with "THIS IS FOR RVLAW"


THIS IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP EXISTS. CONSULT A LAWYER IN YOUR STATE FOR LEGAL ADVICE
Reply
October 24 2007 at 5:37 PM (7 minutes and 8 seconds later)
         
What circumstances would need to be present if in fact att. was not acting in the best interest of all beneficiaries and his drafting of trust is ambiquous with multiple interpretations of decendents wishes?
Answer
October 24 2007 at 6:26 PM (49 minutes later)
         
THIS ANSWER IS LOCKED!
You can view this answer by clicking here to Register or Login and paying $3.
Reply
January 29 2008 at 2:12 AM (96 days and 7 hours later)
         
Thank for your responses to my questions. I have now learned further information regarding the Decedents drafting Attorney, now the successor Trustee's Attorney, and wonder if these facts would change your previous answers:
#1: The Attorney is also the Fidiciuary. I was told this was normal & that he will be responsible in completing & filing all financial documents, e.g. the Estate Taxes, & specifically the IRS Form 706.
#2: Both my sister's receive copies, if not the actual billing from this Attorney. I do not now, nor have I ever been prevy to these statements.
With the exception of the first billing my sister shared with me in an effort to dissuade me to not hire an Attorney to act on my behalf, by showing me the exorburant costs of Attorney's fees(?).
#3: Within that statement, numerous billing costs were due to "conversations" with my sisters. And to date I've not been prevy to the contents of those conversations.
#4. The Trustee & Attorney have both made submittals into Probate Court, which I don't understand due to the contents within the drafted Will & Trust, & my "limited" knowledge of my Mother's Estate Assets:
     A. She owned no real-property, unless a Mortgage Bond, Series E(?), would qualify as real property. (I was told it did not).
     B. She had no outstanding debts or liens.
     C. She had no Employee Pension or Retirement Fund.
     D. Her paid up "Universal" Life Insurance policy, effectuated, June, 1968, my sister's & I beneficiaries, had total proceeds of less then $10,000.00.
     E. Her Will named the Successor Trustee.
        Waived any Bond by Trustee.
        Requested all Cash & Principle Income
        be distributed to us, after funeral costs
        medical bills & creditors, if any, be
        be paid.
     F. The Will included a "Pour-over" clause.
If there wasn't any property which needed to be transferred, why would any submittals be made into Probate? Isn't the point of setting up a Living Trust to avoid Probate?
What was the Attorney's reason in submitting a sealed inventory into Probate, which represented less then .0013% of the Estates disclosed Value?
(Was told it was mandated to ensure funds if unknown Creditor's appear after receiving notice(?)...if they're unknown, how can amounts owed be qualified with submitting a set amount, as "Inventory"?
Lastly, both Trustee & Fidicuary permitted one sister to withdraw over $165,000.00 from a checking account, not held jointly, nor with any POD & gave my Mother's engagement ring, FMV appraisal of $350,000.00 to my other sister, under the undocumented premise it was a "Gift", charging the tax conseqeunces to the Estate, although it is clearly written that any tax liability from "Gifts" that may be given, by means of another document, created and signed by her, would be the sole responsibility of the "Giftee", not the Estate. More frustrating is the fact that they both maintain no Gift Tax IRS Form 709 needs to be submitted even though IRS topics on this subject state the need to do so, when the life time exclusion exceeds the maximum exemption, or annual gifting exceeds the current $12,000.00, per individual. Wouldn't the later apply since as a "Gift" from my Mother would imply she was alive at the time of "Gifting".(Trustee has stated, via email it was not a Death-bed Gift).

After knowing these additional facts do you still think there is not any wrong doing, or favoritism by the Attorney, or Trustee? Is it an issue thatthey have NOT followed the clear directives of my Mother's Will, (submitted into Probate), or the written Trust Instrument written by same attorney, to equally divide all of her Estate amoung her three daughters, unless there is another signed document, that might alter distribution in unequal shares of her Estate. I was told no documents were presented which would alter the original Will & Trust.     
And if it's only "routine" in entering into Probate Court why do so many individual's spend the time & money to set up Living Trusts, which have no actual value or Tax consequences, until death, in their sincere efforts to avoid Probate Court?

I thank you in advance & with apppreciation for your response to my questions.
Answer
January 29 2008 at 2:17 AM (4 minutes and 42 seconds later)
         
REPLIEDCheck Mark

Let me review this new info and get back to you. Funny....I will be in North Palm next week.

Rich Licata



Edited by Richard V. Licata on January 29 2008 at 2:18 AM



IF YOU ARE SATISFIED WITH THE ANSWER, PRESS THE GREEN ACCEPT BUTTON.. Start future questions with "THIS IS FOR RVLAW"


THIS IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP EXISTS. CONSULT A LAWYER IN YOUR STATE FOR LEGAL ADVICE
Reply
January 29 2008 at 2:28 AM (11 minutes and 16 seconds later)
         
Reply to Richard V. Licata's Post: Thank you for your speedy response to my questions. I look forward to your reply.
Godspeed on your trip to N. Palm.

Best Always.
Answer
January 29 2008 at 2:38 AM (9 minutes and 32 seconds later)
         
ACCEPTEDCheck Mark

I'm not leaving for FL until Thursday night. I'll have an answer for you on this later today :-)

Rich Licata




IF YOU ARE SATISFIED WITH THE ANSWER, PRESS THE GREEN ACCEPT BUTTON.. Start future questions with "THIS IS FOR RVLAW"


THIS IS FOR INFORMATION ONLY. NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP EXISTS. CONSULT A LAWYER IN YOUR STATE FOR LEGAL ADVICE
Reply
January 31 2008 at 6:29 PM (2 days and 15 hours later)
         
Hello:
Realize you're leaving for FL tomorrow and wanted to see if you'd been able to peruse my question.

In realizing the Probate Court aspect of my is more then likely not an issue, I'd appreciate your thoughts on other points within my question.
Thanks.
Best,
Cathy
Think you can answer this question?
Login or Become an Expert

 

DISCLAIMER: You acknowledge that any information you may obtain from individuals you contact through use of the JustAnswer service comes from those individuals, not from JustAnswer, and that JustAnswer is not in any way responsible for any of the information these third parties may supply. The site and services are provided "as is" with no warranty and no representations are made regarding the qualification of an Expert. Responses and comments on JustAnswer are for general information and are not intended to substitute for informed professional advice (such as medical, legal, investment or accounting) and do not establish a professional-client relationship. JustAnswer is not intended or designed to address EMERGENCY QUESTIONS which should be directed immediately by telephone or in-person to qualified professionals. Please carefully read the Terms of Service.

JustAnswer > Legal