Facts: The “negative evaluation” previously mentioned and received was not for work performed “badly or below” standards! Yet, my rating has dropped from an   outstanding 4.6 points for the last 10 years to a failing 2.2. points as a retaliatory measure than can be proven. For example, I was negatively evaluated on work, I didn't      perform - on work reassigned to other co-workers, or on work scheduled to be performed some time in the future – in fact, on 16 cases, all continued to be my field of expertise (I am an Anti-Money-Laundering Examiner for the IRS (over 68 years old), I was failed 100 out of 104 times, or 100 out of 104 “critical job     elements”, when in reality I should have passed 100 out of 104 times, at a minimum.

Facts: When I received such bogus evaluation, I immediately filed a Union - NTEU grievance in protest. Three weeks after the filing of my grievance I received a letter from the new and spiteful manager, informing me now, that because of the lower rating – certain of my benefits have been disallowed. For example - that of “flexi-place”, the ability working from my home, instead from the Office. AWS, working 9 hrs. a day and having every 2nd Friday off – and losing my Year-End-Bonus ($1,000) just for not making the passing grades - to name a few.     

Question: Since a grievance was timely filed – protesting the entire evaluation – should not now also the disallowances of my benefits be suspended – until the grievance is decided?

Optional Information:
Los Angeles, California

Already Tried:
Judge Susan Roberts